Friday, January 25, 2013

Actual School Security, Not Emotional Reactions


            When I was given the opportunity to produce a column for the Bulletin, I decided to mostly spin off of Wednesdays’ “Capital Highlights” column, addressing how those items might impact our area. Sadly, this week’s leading topic was prompted by the heinous criminal act of a deranged individual in Newtown, Connecticut.
            The reactions to the taking of those young, innocent lives and the teachers of Sandy Hook Elementary School have been as varied as is humanly possibly. Everywhere, there are speculations as to where blame should be placed; guns, video games, violent movies, bullying, inadequate security, failings of the mental health system… Emotions have been high and understandably so, however, acting solely on those emotions seldom results in beneficial change.
            Wednesday’s edition of “Highlights” quoted Gov. Perry asking all Texas schools to reevaluate their security measures and cited a 2005 law requiring Texas schools “adopt and implement a multi-hazard emergency operations plan”. Fortunately, the state recognized one plan is not suitable to every school district, leaving our local administrators to determine the most effective and efficient measures, in association with local law enforcement. To this end, the law mandates a periodic audit and report to the local board of trustees and to the Texas School Safety Center. Which brings me now to the topic of this column.
            Whenever an incident occurs, like that on December 14th, many begin to question whether or not their children are safe at school and it only takes a spark to send emotions soaring. Case in point, Granbury ISD. Apparently, on Friday, rumors began to spread of threats to students. Over the weekend, hundreds of comments were posted to the school’s Facebook page, perpetuating the rumors and questioning the perceived failures of the administration in informing parents of “the facts”. The Facebook activity, which often contained third hand or further removed information, produced an increasing panic, which no amount of facts would quell.
            According to statements released by the Granbury Police Department and the school on Monday, rumors of a gun found at the school were false, as was the supposed presence of newly written graffiti threats and practically everything else that had been discussed in the social media forum. However, a significant amount of damage had already been done and some parents withheld students from school, on Monday.
            I do not mean to judge them for that, as I’m sure they did what they believed to be in the best interest of their children. But, there are a few things parents should consider, before being drawn in to hysteria, unnecessarily. To begin, school administrations are not going to, and shouldn’t be expected to, comment on every bit of information they receive. That only provides more fuel to already rampant rumors and will likely impede their and law enforcement’s investigations. Additionally, it takes time to sort through the massive amounts of information that comes forth in these events and time is extremely important.
            Next, our schools’ administrations are not going to provide details on all of their security measures and operational plans, in public forums. Understand that doing so would undermine the whole purpose of developing the plan. Often, the most vital and most effective security measures are unseen, by design. Respect that and they will remain effective for a long time.
            The last thing I urge all parents to consider is perhaps the most compelling reason to avoid spreading rumors and publicly doubting the efforts of your school’s administration. Stop to think how many teachers, administrators and support staff have children of their own in their schools. Isn’t it likely they have the same desire to protect their children as the rest of us? Isn’t it likely these teachers would address security concerns with the administration and call them to task, if the response was inadequate?
            The superintendents of Brownwood and Early ISDs have posted statements on their respective district’s websites, extending invitations for questions. I just ask that you keep the preceding suggestions in mind, when formulating your questions and acceptable replies. Specifically, I spoke to Dr. Reece Blincoe on Tuesday, who said “We have been visiting with each of the principles, asking that they seek input from the teachers on their campuses.” Dr. Blincoe said the results of those discussions will be presented in an administrative meeting, before the students return from the Christmas break. He wished to assure parents the Brownwood schools “always put safety first”.
            The murders of the children at Sandy Hook Elementary is a chilling reminder that it is impossible for any of us to guarantee the safety of our own, apart from locking them away from the rest of the world. There are certain risks, which must be accepted if our lives are to have any meaning at all. The most we can do is minimize them through awareness and not allow emotions to dictate our responses.

No comments:

Post a Comment